Review available answers, mentions, citation URLs, prompts, engines, markets, and neutral unavailable states.
answer.
Turn cross-engine AI visibility evidence into a prioritized, verifiable enterprise program. Measure what answer surfaces say, improve the public sources they rely on, and document what changed.
CiteSurge combines evidence-led audits, weekly-default AI visibility measurement, and prioritized implementation guidance across four connected GEO capabilities.
Search still ranks.
Answers now summarize.
SEO remains foundational. GEO adds direct measurement of supported, configured answer surfaces and the public evidence they use.
Answers coexist with ranked results
Visibility needs answer evidence
SEO still matters
Four disciplines.
One outcome.
We improve answer clarity, measure configured surfaces weekly by default, review technical readiness, and prioritize credible source evidence. Each finding keeps its scope and limitations.
- Seven supported answer surfaces when configured, ready, and enabled
- Weekly monitoring cadence by default on current paid plans
- Available answers, mention context, prompts, markets, and citation URLs
- Live dashboard plus branded PDF and Markdown exports
- REST API, MCP, and signed audit-run webhooks for eligible paid projects: Pro, Agency, and Enterprise
Citability Engineering
Make important passages clear, self-contained, and supported.
Review and improve passage clarity, entity context, structure, attribution, and source evidence, then measure configured answer surfaces over time.
Learn moreMulti-Engine Monitoring
Review configured answer surfaces with the evidence attached.
Weekly-default citation and mention measurement across supported, configured answer surfaces, with explicit unavailable states.
Learn moreTechnical & Semantic Foundations
Make public evidence accessible and internally consistent.
Review crawl policy, rendering, canonicals, structured data, sitemaps, performance evidence, and AI-readable files without claiming they guarantee citation.
Learn moreBrand Mention Expansion
Turn verified source gaps into credible editorial priorities.
Document relevant public mentions and citations, distinguish owned from independent sources, and prioritize credible editorial opportunities.
Learn moreEvidence becomes work.
Work leaves a record.
CiteSurge connects cross-engine AI visibility evidence to a prioritized enterprise program, then documents later observations without turning correlation into a guarantee.
- ObserveKeep answers, mentions, citation URLs, prompts, engines, markets, and timing attached.
- PrioritizeConnect supported findings to source, content, technical, and brand owners.
- VerifyRecord implementation and compare later observations within their own scope.
Evidence with context
Available answers, mention context, citation URLs, prompts, engines, markets, timing, and unavailable states stay attached to the record.
Implementation guidance
Supported findings become prioritized work for the content, brand, and web teams that own the affected source or page.
Verifiable reporting
A live dashboard plus branded PDF and Markdown exports document evidence, recommended work, scope, and limitations.
Enterprise scope
Scoped workspaces, multiple tracked brands, white-label reporting, REST API, MCP, and signed webhooks support eligible workflows.
Keep evidence
attached to action.
Configured runs preserve available answer, mention, citation, prompt, engine, market, timing, and availability context in one review surface.
Illustrative product layout. No client outcome or performance result is represented.
Connect crawl policy, rendering, canonicals, structured data, sitemaps, performance evidence, and AI-readable files to affected pages.
Route supported findings to content, brand, and web teams with scope, priority, and evidence attached.
Use the live dashboard and branded PDF or Markdown exports to share current evidence and later observations.
Bring your audit
into your AI tools.
Connect CiteSurge to Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, and any MCP client, or call the same data from the REST API, typed against a published OpenAPI 3.1 spec. Your team can carry supported findings into its controlled implementation workflow. Signed webhooks report audit completion. Included on paid plans: Pro, Agency, and Enterprise.
Read findings where you work
Your agent pulls live scores, citations, mentions, and prioritized recommendations over MCP, with no copy-paste from a dashboard.
Carry findings into implementation
Use prioritized recommendations in your chosen workflow, keep publication under your control, and compare later measurements after approved changes ship.
Report without leaving the chat
citesurge-report composes a stakeholder-ready Slack or email update from your latest scores, trend, and top recommendations.
npx @citesurge/skills
claude mcp add --transport http citesurge https://citesurge.com/api/mcp \
--header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_KEY>"Pricing that scales
with every brand you add.
- 7 engines tracked weekly (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AIO, Bing Copilot, and Grok)
- 1 brand · 3 markets
- 60 monitored prompts
- 12-month history
- Continuous citability engineering
- Brand mention graph expansion
- PDF + Markdown report export
- API + MCP access
- Cmd-K dashboard + email support
- All 7 engines tracked weekly
- Up to 25 brands · 5 markets
- 150 monitored prompts
- 12-month history
- Scoped workspaces
- White-label reporting
- API + MCP access where enabled
- All 7 engines tracked weekly
- Unlimited brands · 5 markets
- Unlimited monitored prompts
- Full history
- Scoped workspaces
- Multi-brand reporting
- White-label report options
- API + MCP access where enabled
- Custom implementation scope
The questions
buyers ask first.
What does CiteSurge measure?
Within configured prompts, markets, and answer surfaces, CiteSurge records whether available replies name your brand, which citation URLs they return, and how they describe you where supported and available. Current paid plans use a weekly cadence by default.
Which engines do you track, and how often?
CiteSurge supports measurement across ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Bing Copilot, and Grok when each surface is configured, ready, and enabled for the project. Current paid plans use a weekly cadence by default; available evidence can vary by run.
How is the score worked out?
The score summarizes evidence from the recorded project scope. Review it alongside available answers, mention context, citation URLs, prompts, engines, markets, timing, and unavailable states. It is a prioritization aid, not a guarantee. See the public methodology.
Is this a one-off audit or ongoing tracking?
Both. You get a branded report with prioritized implementation guidance and a live dashboard for ongoing review. Current paid plans use a weekly monitoring cadence by default, subject to project scope, configuration, and answer-surface availability.
Can I see what the AI said about me, word for word?
For configured answer surfaces, the Mentions view keeps available answer passages and mention context, plus citation counts where supported and available. When reliable evidence does not surface, the view shows a neutral unavailable state.
Do you track competitors?
For configured prompts, markets, and enabled answer surfaces, we record rival brands named or cited where supported and available. Results remain tied to the run's scope and availability; they do not establish a durable rank.
What does it cost?
Pro is €499/mo, or €399/mo billed annually: 7 engines tracked weekly (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AIO, Bing Copilot, and Grok), 1 brand · 3 markets, 60 monitored prompts, 12-month history, plus MCP and API access. Agency and Enterprise plans handle larger rollouts. See pricing.
Can my own tools pull the data?
Every paid plan (Pro, Agency, and Enterprise) includes an MCP server and a REST API. Connect Claude Code, Claude Desktop, or Cursor and read your scores, citations, and fix list, or trigger a re-run, without leaving the tool. Setup lives on the help page.
Search is becoming
a conversation.
Make sure you're in it.
The web grew up around ten blue links. An entire economy (SEO, content mills, affiliate networks) depends on the assumption that people will scroll. They won't. Not for much longer.
The models are the new surface. They decide which names enter the answer, and which ones don't exist. That decision is the next decade of search, compressed into a sentence.
We built CiteSurge because that sentence deserves a serious discipline behind it. Not tips. Not hacks. An agency that engineers your presence in AI answers and proves it, audit after audit.
— the CiteSurge team